The creator economy keeps getting bigger. Analysts estimate it at just over $200 billion in 2024, with forecasts pushing it past $1.3 trillion by 2033, driven by streaming, short-form video, and direct-to-fan monetization.  

But inside that big number, music still runs on leaky pipes. Streams are perfectly digital; the money behind them often isn’t. Royalties move slowly, ownership records are messy, and smaller artists are usually the ones left chasing missing income.

A new wave of projects is trying to change that by turning music rights into real-world assets (RWA) on blockchains, and anchoring those rights to on-chain registries instead of scattered spreadsheets. One of the more aggressive experiments in that direction is BeatSwap, a full-stack Web3 platform that transforms music IP into tokenized assets and ties them to verifiable rights data.  

This isn’t about NFT collectibles. It’s about treating songs as clearly defined, cash-flowing assets, and giving artists, fans, and investors a way to own and trade them with far less guesswork about who should get paid.

The problem behind the playlist: streams are digital, rights are not

On the surface, streaming looks solved. You hit play on Spotify, Apple Music, or YouTube; the song loads instantly; your history syncs across devices. Underneath, the economics are still built on legacy infrastructure.

A typical royalty flow still runs like this: platforms send usage and payment data to labels, publishers, and collecting societies; those entities reconcile it against their own records, apply contracts and splits, deduct fees, and eventually send what’s left to artists—often months later. If metadata is wrong, if a songwriter isn’t properly listed, or if a song has conflicting registrations, money can sit in limbo or be misdirected entirely.  

For emerging creators, the problems stack:

• They’re spread across fragmented distribution—Spotify, TikTok, YouTube, reels, shorts, background catalog licensing—without a single, clean view of where their work is used.  
• They have little leverage to audit intermediaries or challenge bad data.
• They often need upfront capital for production and marketing, but loans or advances usually require giving up ownership or taking on restrictive deals.

So even though every stream is technically trackable, not every royalty is traceable. That’s the gap tokenized music rights, backed by on-chain IP registries, are trying to close.

Music as a real-world asset

“Tokenization” sounds abstract, but at heart it’s simple: you turn something into a digital asset that can be owned and tracked on a blockchain. In finance, this might be real estate or treasury bills. In music, it’s usually a song, or a share of the rights to that song.  

A token in this context is a tiny slice of a song’s income stream. Instead of one label or fund holding 100% of the royalty rights, an artist can split a defined portion into hundreds or thousands of pieces. Fans, investors, or collaborators can buy those pieces, and smart contracts can route future royalty payments to whoever holds them.  

That does three important things:

• It makes music rights fractional, you don’t need millions to participate.
• It makes rights potentially more liquid, easier to sell or rebalance later.
• It makes payouts more programmable, less reliant on manual reconciliation.

Projects like Royalty Exchange and Royal.io have already shown that fans will buy slices of royalties and share in streaming income when the rails exist.  

BeatSwap picks up that thread, but leans much harder into the “infrastructure” side: building a system where music rights become RWAs only after the underlying IP data is clean and verifiable.

The Oracle: fixing metadata at the root

BeatSwap’s architecture starts with something very un-flashy but critical: an Oracle, an on-chain registry deployed on the Internet Computer and opBNB networks.  

Instead of treating metadata as an afterthought, the Oracle is designed to be a canonical record for each work, storing:

• Basic details like title and composer
• Rights-holder information
• Licensing and usage data
• Royalty history over time

Because it’s on-chain, this registry can be queried by other parts of the BeatSwap stack—and, in principle, by external streaming or analytics partners—to answer the most important question in music finance: who should get what, when?  

For tokenized music rights to function as real-world assets, that foundation matters. You can’t sensibly trade or finance an asset if you’re not sure who owns it, or how the cash flows are defined. The Oracle’s role is to reduce that uncertainty before anything gets sliced into tokens.

RWA Launcher: slicing songs into investable units

Once rights are registered and legally checked, BeatSwap’s RWA Launcher turns each song into a fixed set of 2,000 RWA tokens.  

The typical distribution per song looks roughly like this:

• A portion is sold to investors in an initial offering, providing upfront capital.
• A portion is reserved for the creator, so they keep meaningful upside.
• A portion is allocated to BeatSwap for IP acquisition and rights-management alignment.  
• The remaining share is paired with the platform token BTX to seed liquidity on decentralized exchanges.

Legally, the IP still exists as contracts and registrations. Economically, a defined slice of that IP’s royalty stream is now wrapped into tokens that can move more flexibly between wallets, markets, and jurisdictions.

For an artist, this opens up financing options beyond traditional advances: they can sell part of their future income to backers while keeping control over the rest of the catalog. For investors, it’s a way to build a portfolio of song-based income streams, not just speculate on platform coins.

A marketplace for rights, not just tokens

On top of the Oracle and RWA Launcher sits the BeatSwap DEX, a decentralized exchange built specifically for trading Oracle-registered IP rights. All IP tokens trade against BTX in automated market maker (AMM) pools, just like other DeFi assets—but with royalties attached to the underlying.  

Two things are notable here:

1. Liquidity providers (LPs) don’t just earn swap fees; they also receive a share of royalties from RWA tokens deposited into pools, offsetting the usual impermanent-loss problem with a more organic yield source.  
2. Investors who buy and hold RWA tokens can stake them under a Proof of Rights (PoR) model. After completing KYC, these holders are treated as registered neighboring rights holders, entitled to a portion of daily royalty distributions rather than just price appreciation.  

In other words, the marketplace isn’t only for swapping coins; it’s part of the royalty plumbing. Price discovery, secondary trading, and payout logic are all tied back to the same on-chain registry.

That’s what “songs becoming assets” looks like from a market perspective: not just an NFT on a profile picture grid, but an income-bearing instrument with a traceable rights tree and a live secondary market.

Where creators and fans fit into this picture

Treating songs as RWAs and putting rights data on-chain is only half the story. The other half is: who gets to sit at the table?

For creators, the pitch is straightforward:

• Register works once, properly, in the Oracle.
• Decide how much of a song’s future royalties to tokenize.
• Receive BTX and/or other consideration when transferring IP slices into the RWA Launcher.  
• Get royalties routed via PoR staking and BeatSwap’s distribution logic, with a clear record of how those payouts were calculated.

For fans, the model moves them one step closer to being actual participants:

• They can buy small fractions of songs they care about, not just stream them.
• In BeatSwap’s Space social layer, fan activity (follows, likes, comments) is recorded on-chain and feeds into a creator’s Exposure Score, while fans earn BTX for engagement—turning attention into measurable contribution rather than pure vanity metrics.  

For investors, the appeal is a bit more familiar: this is another RWA vertical, but backed by a cultural asset class that already generates billions in recurring revenue. Tokenization, if done properly, provides visibility into usage data and a liquid wrapper around those cash flows.

In all three cases, the aim is the same: align incentives by making the underlying rights and money flows legible.

Proof of Listening: when plays become proof of value

BeatSwap’s broader thesis goes beyond who holds the tokens. It’s about how usage itself is recorded and rewarded.

Through its Licensing-to-Earn (L2E) and “Proof of Listening” concept, the platform leans on a DePIN-style logic: treat verified consumption of authorized IP as Direct Network Contribution. Streams and licensed uses, validated against the Oracle and an IP Licensing Index, can become the basis for BTX rewards and reputation for both creators and participants.

In that framing:

• A stream isn’t just a line in a platform dashboard; it’s a data point that can trigger on-chain settlement.
• A community that reliably drives plays can, in theory, earn and prove its impact.
• Over time, “Proof of Listening” could sit alongside PoR as a second pillar: one tracks who owns the rights, the other tracks who actually fuels demand.

It’s an attempt to make streaming data do more than power recommendation algorithms, it becomes part of the money rail itself.

What still has to go right

None of this is automatic, and the risks are real.

Regulatory clarity is still evolving. Many IP-backed tokens look a lot like securities, which means registration, disclosures, and KYC/AML obligations will matter, especially in major markets.  

Data integrity is another hard problem. An on-chain Oracle is only as reliable as the rights checks and ingestion processes behind it. Fake streams, bot farms, and disputes over who actually owns what can’t be solved by smart contracts alone; they need governance, audits, and enforcement.

Then there’s UX. Most artists don’t want to juggle seed phrases, bridges, or DEX positions. BeatSwap and similar platforms will have to hide most of the Web3 complexity behind familiar flows—artist dashboards, simple payout screens, fiat on-ramps—if they want adoption beyond crypto-native circles.

And finally, market volatility: putting rights on-chain doesn’t shield them from broader crypto cycles. A catalog token’s price might swing for reasons that have more to do with risk sentiment than with how often the music is actually played.

A catalog that knows who owns it

Still, the direction of travel is clear. The creator economy is headed toward a world where attention, usage, and payout data are all more tightly linked.  

In that world, platforms that treat songs as on-chain real-world assets, backed by registries that actually know who owns what, have a shot at fixing some of the music industry’s oldest structural problems: orphan royalties, opaque splits, and financing tools that only work for stars.

BeatSwap’s full-stack experiment—Oracle, RWA Launcher, DEX, social layer, PoR, and eventually Proof of Listening—is one of the more ambitious attempts to build those rails end-to-end. Whether it becomes a new standard or remains a pioneering niche, it points toward a simple but overdue idea: If songs are going to live as digital files anyway, their rights and revenues should be just as trackable as their streams.

‍