In the wake of high-profile collapses like FTX, one lesson became painfully clear to crypto users worldwide: just because an exchange says your funds are safe doesn’t mean they actually are. For too long, trust in platforms was based on logos and marketing. Now, the bar is higher, and Proof of Reserves (PoR) has become one of the clearest indicators of whether an exchange is playing fair.

But not all PoR reports are equal. And understanding how to read them—and spot what’s missing—could mean the difference between protecting your assets and unknowingly placing them at risk.

What a Real Proof of Reserves Should Show

A legitimate PoR report isn’t just a tweet or spreadsheet. It must show that:

• The exchange knows exactly how much its users have deposited.
• It can point to on-chain wallets holding real, verifiable assets.
• It can cryptographically prove that it has equal to or more assets than liabilities, without needing users to “just trust” the numbers.

Anything short of this is just lip service.

Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Security Without Sacrificing Privacy

Many reputable exchanges are now using Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) to make this possible. These are mathematical techniques that allow an exchange to prove a claim — like “we have 100% of customer funds backed”—without revealing individual balances or sensitive user data.

Popular crypto platforms like OKX implements zk-STARK (Zero-Knowledge Scalable Transparent Argument of Knowledge) to create encrypted records using what’s called a Merkle tree. This system ensures that no user is left out of the report, that all balances are accounted for, and that no tampering has occurred. Through this they have released 37 consecutive PoRs as of November 2025.

The platform takes a snapshot of every user’s balance, encodes that information in a Merkle tree, and applies three key checks. First, it verifies that all accounts are included. Second, it ensures no account has a negative balance. Third, it confirms that the total user assets match the reserves held in on-chain wallets.

Red Flags to Watch For in PoR Claims

The reality is that many platforms still avoid true transparency. As a user, here’s what should raise alarm bells:

• No on-chain data: If you can’t verify wallet addresses yourself, the claim is unverifiable.
• No cryptography involved: Reports that don’t use ZKPs or Merkle proofs may rely on blind trust.
• Infrequent or inconsistent updates: A single snapshot every 6 months isn’t accountability.
• No open-source tools: If you can’t independently audit the results, the system favors the platform, not the user.

Trustless by Design

Crypto was built on the principle of verifiability without trust. That principle is now being applied to centralized platforms through innovations like zk-STARK and Proof of Reserves systems.

When a platform offers not just a report, but the tools to prove it to yourself, that’s when users regain control.

‍